Category Archives: costs of wrongful convictions

Forensics: From The Intercept’s investigator journalists Jordan Smith and Liliana Segura. Emails Show Oklahoma AG Agreed to Release Richard Glossip

In an explosive new court filing, Glossip’s attorneys accuse Gentner Drummond of reneging on a plan negotiated in 2023. — Read on theintercept.com/2025/07/16/glossip-drummond-oklahoma-death-row/

Posted in Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, prosecutorial misconduct, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Federal Court Excoriates Prosecutors in Grant of Relief to Former Virginia Death-Sentenced Prisoner Who Has Always Maintained His Innocence | Death Penalty Information Center

On July 7, 2025, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of for­mer Virginia death-sen­tenced pris­on­er Justin Wolfe, vacat­ing a low­er… — Read on deathpenaltyinfo.org/federal-court-excoriates-prosecutors-in-grant-of-relief-to-former-virginia-death-sentenced-prisoner-who-has-always-maintained-his-innocence

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, Perjury by Prosecutors, prosecutorial misconduct, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: One of the worst miscarriages of justice in the UK.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/united-kingdom/least-13-killed-uks-post-office-wrongful-convictions-scandal-rcna217676

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Cops withholding alibi proofs put him in prison for 27 years.

https://law.duke.edu/news/wrongful-convictions-clinic-client-released-after-serving-27-years-prison

Posted in costs of wrongful convictions, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

John Grisham: Why is Jimmie “Chris” Duncan on LA death row

I helped develop the case against the faked bitemark evidence evidence used to convict Duncan. Jimmie Duncan was convicted in Louisiana almost solely on the wholly fabricated theories of two notorious forensic experts — pathologist Steven Hayne and odontologist Michael … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime, criminal justice reform, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: appeals court finds gun forensic method is not ‘scientifically valid’

Subjectivity in bullet casing matching method is not based on scientific proof. Bitemark opinions are no better. An Oregon appeals court found that the AFTE gun forensics method in cases involving shootings is not “scientifically valid” and could change how … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk bitemark expert’s reign of terror leads to 9th case overturned. DA still demands execution.

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Junk bitemark expert’s reign of terror leads to 9th case overturned. DA still demands execution.

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Alaska awards $$$ for decades long false imprisonment.

https://apnews.com/article/alaska-fairbanks-four-lawsuit-settlement-096c35f8e29bdbb19529fd21244a515b

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: The quagmire of law enforcent agencies leads to poor quality control and standards in forrensic services. There are 18000 separate cop shops in the US. Article by Professor Max Houck.

https://open.substack.com/pub/maxhouck/p/the-juridictional-problem-in-forensic?r=j5102&utm_medium=ios

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform | Leave a comment