Forensics Canada: Bitemarkers run amok; Courts and DAs prefer case precedence over science.

887a2-snakeoil

This is a 50 page UBC Law Review narrative on the inadequacies of courts to recognize junk “forensic” experts. Battling Canadian bitemarkers leave a trail of exaggerated claims and criminal case law that is blind to scientific principles.

SSRN-id3201061

 

 

Posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, expert testimony, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Forensics: #NamUS. Police/Coroners must utilize this public access database. Police compliance for Missings is abysmally low.Its only at 50% for Unknowns.Some even refuse to participate. Mother of missing child advocates for legislation to aid missing ppl.

https://www.firstalert4.com/2024/01/02/mother-missing-child-advocates-legislation-aid-missing-people-missouri/

Posted in AAFS, missing persons | Leave a comment

Forensics: Company says all is AOK with this. Cops Used DNA to Predict a Suspect’s Face—and Tried to Run Facial Recognition on It | WIRED

Police around the US say they’re justified to run DNA-generated 3D models of faces through facial recognition tools to help crack cold cases. Everyone but the cops thinks that’s a bad idea.
— Read on www.wired.com/story/parabon-nanolabs-dna-face-models-police-facial-recognition/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic science misconduct, human identification, Medical errors, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Wrap this up and show to all the bitemarkers lecturing at the #AAFS mtg next month. AI discovers that not every fingerprint is unique. EurekAlert!

AI discovers that not every fingerprint is un | EurekAlert!
— Read on www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1030475

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, human identification, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Only “New Evidence” Allows $$$. Lieing cops and DAs don’t count. Why is Michigan Failing to Compensate the Wrongly Convicted? — ProPublica

The state can provide the wrongfully convicted compensation of $50,000 for each year of incarceration, but the law’s narrow criteria and confusion over eligibility leave former prisoners facing another system that seems stacked against them.
— Read on www.propublica.org/article/why-michigan-failing-compensate-wrongly-convicted-despite-law

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations | Leave a comment

Forensics: Tell this to all the Indian academic bitemarkers and lip print gurus. A need to define forensic expertise- The New Indian Express

In France, experts are often selected by judges from lists published by the courts.
— Read on www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2024/jan/03/a-need-to-define-forensic-expertise-2647232.html

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Perpetuating pseudoscience. Old-School Hair Analysis Is Junk Science. But It Still Keeps People Behind Bars

The technique, developed before DNA testing, can’t definitively tie suspects to crime scenes.Try explaining that to juries — or some judges.
— Read on scheerpost.com/2023/12/30/old-school-hair-analysis-is-junk-science-but-it-still-keeps-people-behind-bars/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, exoneration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human identification, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Cheaters in the lab. NYC Medical Examiner reviews 100s of cases in analysts probe

New York City’s Medical Examiner’s office said Friday it is reviewing hundreds of cases in a probe of misconduct by three forensic analysts
— Read on www.nydailynews.com/2023/12/15/nyc-medical-examiners-office-reviewing-hundreds-of-cases-in-budding-lab-scandal/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, forensic science misconduct, US Crime labs | 1 Comment

Forensics: A Trail of Tears. How the Junk Science of Hair Analysis Keeps People Behind Bars – Mother Jones

Each of these cases takes years to litigate and $ defendants don’t possess. The technique, developed before DNA testing, can’t definitively tie suspects to crime scenes. Try explaining that to juries — or some judges.
— Read on www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/12/how-the-junk-science-of-hair-analysis-keeps-people-behind-bars/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, forensic testimony, human rights violations, junk forensic science, prosecutorial misconduct, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Expert in ancient DNA and wildlife forensics helps identify Oct. 7 massacre victims | The Times of Israel

Hebrew University Prof. Gila Kahila Bar-Gal uses her knowledge of difficult DNA extraction and physical anthropology as she volunteers at Abu Kabir
— Read on www.timesofisrael.com/expert-in-ancient-dna-and-wildlife-forensics-helps-identify-oct-7-massacre-victims/

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: DNA extraction produces STR markers. The evidential value of dental calculus in the identification process | Scientific Reports

DNA analysis-based identification is by far the gold standard in forensic genetics and it should be performed in every case involving human remains or unidentified bodies. Bones and teeth are the preferred source of human DNA for genetic analysis. However, there are cases where the nature of the proceedings and historical significance prevent the disruption of skeletal structure. The remains may also be heavily degraded. In such situations, forensic geneticists seek alternative sources of human DNA. Teeth calculus has proven to be a viable source of DNA for identification purposes. The aim of this study was to assess the concentration of human DNA in teeth calculus and evaluate the usefulness of teeth calculus as a DNA source in the identification process. Teeth calculus was collected from skeletons exhumed between 2021 and 2022 by the PBGOT (Polish Genetic Database of Victims of Totalitarianism) team from the former Stalag IID prisoner-of-war camp in Stargard. Genetic analyses included the determination of autosomal and Y-STR markers. The total concentration of human DNA was also evaluated in samples from teeth calculus and teeth taken from the same individuals. The pilot study included 22 skeletons with a sufficient amount of calculus for isolation (specified in the protocol). Samples were taken from the largest areas of calculus deposited on lingual surfaces of mandibular incisors. The prepared samples underwent DNA extraction. Our study demonstrated that teeth calculus is a source of human DNA for remains from the World War II period. The obtained DNA concentration allowed for the determination of STR markers. It was shown that teeth calculus contains human DNA in an amount suitable for preliminary identification analyses.
— Read on www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-48761-7

Posted in DNA profiling, Forensic Dentistry, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment