Tag Archives: Daubert rulling

Forensics: OMG. Ballistics ID refused. A D.C. judge’s much-needed opinion on ‘junk science’ – The Washington Post

Ballistic IDs got seriously limited in this one. Judge says “no expert opinion without science to back it up.” You know, stuff abt accuracy and error rates. DAs and USDOJers say all is still good with police forensics. Not. Much … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, CSI, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, police crime labs, US Crime labs | Tagged , | Leave a comment