Category Archives: forensic evidence exaggeration

Forensics: Expert tries to confuse belief of reliability for unvalidated soil DNA test. Kristin Smart murder trial: Presentation of evidence concludes, closing statements to begin on Monday – Mustang News

Thursday marked the conclusion of the presentation of evidence for the Kristin Smart murder trial. — Read on mustangnews.net/kristin-smart-murder-trial-presentation-of-evidence-concludes-closing-statements-to-begin-on-monday/

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science, Medical errors | Leave a comment

Forensics: Danny Lee Hill ‘bite-mark’ claim sent to US judge

Post convictin DAs say the junk science had no effect on the conviction. Utter BS. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Sixth District Court of Appeals has ordered a public defender’s bid to reopen convicted murderer Danny Lee Hill’s new … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Shaken-Baby Cases Rely on ‘Junk Science,’ New Jersey Judge Says

The pediatric neurosurgeon who first popularized shaken-baby syndrome has doubts about how it is used in courtrooms today. — Read on reason.com/2022/08/01/a-judge-says-shaken-baby-cases-rely-on-junk-science/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Civil rights, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Go Valena Beety! ‘Cultural Bias’ and Wrongful Convictions of Women

Women are more likely than men to be convicted for crimes they didn’t commit—or for crimes that never occurred—and they often face harsher sentences, a webinar was told. — Read on thecrimereport.org/2022/07/22/cultural-bias-and-wrongful-convictions-of-women/

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, wrongful convictions | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Confessions of an ex-bitemarker. 30 minute podcast. Details of the classic forensic psuedo-science.

thisiscriminal.com/episode-191-the-sailors-teeth-6-24-2022/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, human rights violations, junk forensic science, William Richards Exoneration Case | Leave a comment

Forensics: Preemie mom in jail for a year. Biased and incompetent Autopsies Have a History of Costly Mistakes, Yet Change Is Slow

Id say change aint happening when considering the Nat’l Asso of Medical Examiners rabid response the Itiel Dror’s research into pathologists’ cognitive biases involving racial stereotypes. Disastrous errors by medical examiners have raised questions about whether they are influenced by … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Taxpayers must pay. Pardoned Chicago man reaches $7.5M settlement

A Chicago man who was pardoned after spending more than seven years in prison for an armed robbery he didn’t commit has reached a $7.5 million settlement with a northern Indiana city and former police officers — Read on http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/attorney-pardoned-chicago-man-reaches-75m-settlement/2022/05/04/ebdfbf58-cbd0-11ec-b7ee-74f09d827ca6_story.html

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration | Leave a comment

Forensics: Australia. How did we fall for the junk science of forensics?

US described as “bitemark crazy.” I grew up in the golden age of forensic science, at a time when expert witnesses were becoming celebs, each with their special little area of crimebusting… — Read on http://www.spectator.com.au/2022/05/how-fact-killed-my-belief-in-forensics/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Brown shooting evidence, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: Despite exoneration cases debunking these opinions, all a judge needs is a bite mark, a forensic dentist, and a heinous murder: how junk science ruins innocent lives.

Charles McCrory has spent decades in prison for the murder of his wife, convicted on the strength of bite mark evidence. The problem? CSI-style forensics is bad science — Read on http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/28/forensics-bite-mark-junk-science-charles-mccrory-chris-fabricant

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensicsy Mubai Report Nails Youth Who Bit Minor Girl

Bitemarkism alive and well in the subcontinent. A special POCSO court that convicted and sentenced a 22-year-old youth to three years’ rigorous imprisonment for sexually harassing a 17-year-old gir — Read on timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/odontologists-report-nails-youth-who-bit-minor-girl/articleshow/90384750.cms

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment