Category Archives: costs of wrongful convictions

Forensics: ‘Junk science’: Counterfeit research papers in China, a worrying trend

‘Junk science’: Counterfeit research papers in China, a worrying trend – The BL — Read on m.thebl.com/china/junk-science-counterfeit-research-papers-in-china-a-worrying-trend.html

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: The history of DAs supporting junk science. A look back in time.

csidds.com/2016/12/09/are-we-in-the-twilight-zone-bitemarks-can-now-prove-innocence/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: Men exonerated in Malcolm X killing to receive $36 million – POLITICO

Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam were exonerated last year in the 1965 assassination. — Read on http://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/30/malcolm-x-killing-exonerated-settlement-00064156

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, prosecutorial misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Bitemarks take another hit in 2022. Why Is Bad Science Allowed in the Courtroom? | Psychology Today

A new report finds that a well-known forensic technique is unscientific. — Read on http://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/how-do-you-know/202210/why-is-bad-science-allowed-in-the-courtroom

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Brown shooting evidence, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | 1 Comment

Forensics: DA denied DNA testing in 2000. Now man released from California prison after 38 years following new DNA evidence

A man who spent more than 38 years behind bars convicted of murder and two attempted murders has been released from a California prison after long-untested DNA evidence pointed to a different person. The conviction of Maurice Hastings, 69, and … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, DNA profiling, exoneration, Exoneration costs, forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment

Forensics: Every Year, Around $800M Spent on Wrongful Convictions

Adnan Syed’s case caught the nation’s attention thanks to its feature in the popular podcast “Serial,” and led to the once-convicted murderer having his conviction overturned, — Read on http://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2022/10/28/every_year_around_800m_spent_on_wrongful_convictions_860485.html

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Perjury by Prosecutors | Leave a comment

Forensics: Awesome. Marvel chairman commits millions for Cardozo law school to fight faulty forensics.

From bite marks to blood spatter, a New York law school wants to train current and future attorneys about forensic evidence and the ways it can be misused in the courtroom. — Read on http://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/marvel-chairman-commits-millions-law-school-fight-faulty-forensics-2022-10-27/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Forensic Dentistry, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: From Egypt. CT scan used for bitemark comparison.

http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Said-Elshama/publication/364359100_How_to_Apply_Virtual_Autopsy_in_Egypt/links/634faf4212cbac6a3ed841e9/How-to-Apply-Virtual-Autopsy-in-Egypt.pdf

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | 1 Comment

Forensics: Only 72% of exonerated are compensated. Will Adnan Syed be compensated for his time in prison?

After being exonerated and leaving prison, another battle often begins: Getting paid for lost time. Some people receive millions, others get nothing. — Read on http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/10/23/adnan-syed-exoneration-compensation/10528473002/

Posted in Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, Exoneration costs | Leave a comment

“Untrue Forensics”: Junk science tilts justice against those charged with crimes

More than 3,200 Americans have been wrongfully convicted in recent decades, more than half of them because forensic science has been misapplied, or worse, the evidence is false. — Read on http://www.hubcityspokes.com/state-features-documents/mcir-junk-science-tilts-justice-against-those-charged-crimes-6352dadce9434

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Exoneration costs, forensic fraud, Forensic science misconduct | Leave a comment