Forensics: Dead infant not a homicide. Flawed science on “shaken baby” conviction used in capital murder conviction

Dr. Ophaven is a champ.

A forensic doctor testified that science used in the death penalty case of Robert Leslie Roberson III, was flawed during the continuance of the evidentiary hearing Monday, March 8

https://www.palestineherald.com/news/doctor-flawed-science-used-in-capital-murder-conviction/article_18350b72-8077-11eb-b978-e786ee5b9ecb.html

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Medical errors, wrongful convictions and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Forensics: Dead infant not a homicide. Flawed science on “shaken baby” conviction used in capital murder conviction

  1. sergiocastellon7281 says:

    Broken link.

    On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:42 AM FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends wrote:

    > csidds posted: “Dr. Ophoven is a champ. A forensic doctor testified that > science used in the death penalty case of Robert Leslie Roberson III, was > flawed during the continuance of the evidentiary hearing Monday, March 8 in > — Read on http://www.palestineherald.com/content/tncms” >

Leave a Reply to sergiocastellon7281 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s