Forensics: Dead infant not a homicide. Flawed science on “shaken baby” conviction used in capital murder conviction

Posted on March 9, 2021 by csidds

Dr. Ophaven is a champ.

A forensic doctor testified that science used in the death penalty case of Robert Leslie Roberson III, was flawed during the continuance of the evidentiary hearing Monday, March 8

https://www.palestineherald.com/news/doctor-flawed-science-used-in-capital-murder-conviction/article_18350b72-8077-11eb-b978-e786ee5b9ecb.html

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, Forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Medical errors, wrongful convictions and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Forensics: Dead infant not a homicide. Flawed science on “shaken baby” conviction used in capital murder conviction

  1. sergiocastellon7281's avatar sergiocastellon7281 says:
    March 9, 2021 at 9:54 am

    Broken link.

    On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:42 AM FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends wrote:

    > csidds posted: “Dr. Ophoven is a champ. A forensic doctor testified that > science used in the death penalty case of Robert Leslie Roberson III, was > flawed during the continuance of the evidentiary hearing Monday, March 8 in > — Read on http://www.palestineherald.com/content/tncms” >

    Reply

Leave a reply to sergiocastellon7281 Cancel reply