Category Archives: human identification

Forensics: How not to exaggerate DNA Likelihood ratios for lawyers.

It all starts with lawyers and judges learning some science. Good luck with that. Someone says “knowledge is not understanding.” This piece desxribes the didference. By Raymond ValerioChief of the Forensic Science Unit, Bronx County (New York) District Attorney’s Office … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, criminal justice, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Modern face of Homo antecessor may have had insufficient room for wisdom teeth

Oral surgeons would have had a field day back then. Modern face of Homo antecessor may have had insufficient room for wisdom teeth — Read on phys.org/news/2020-01-modern-homo-antecessor-insufficient-room.amp

Posted in human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: App created by Clemson researcher uses photos of dead bodies, roadkill to help forensic teams determine time of death | Clemson University News and Stories, South Carolina

Im not sure about the “near instant” part. A new smartphone app developed by a Clemson researcher is designed to aid coroners and forensic teams in determining time of death by improving the understanding of body decomposition. The app allows … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, CSI, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, human identification, missing persons, post mortem interval | Leave a comment

Forensics: read every word. DNA mixtures – Do you understand them? | Forensic Context

A simple introduction to DNA mixtures in forensic science, what are they, why they occur and the issues with assessing their evidential value. — Read on http://www.forensiccontext.com/dna-mixtures-do-you-understand-them/

Posted in AAFS, CSI, DNA mixtures, DNA profiling, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: The shoes tell the tale. Forensic anthropologists: Bones on bluff likely from late 1800s

The shoes will tell them more, according to Dr. Jered Cornelison. — Read on http://www.shorelinemedia.net/content/tncms/live/

Posted in AAFS, forensic pathology, Forensic Science, human identification, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forensics: A comparison of proteomic, genomic, and osteological methods of archaeological sex estimation

Very obvious as to who wins this contest. Bones at the bottom. Sex estimation of skeletons is fundamental to many archaeological studies. Currently, three approaches are available to estimate sex–osteology, genomics, or proteomics, but little is known about the relative … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Facial Reconstruction of a Prehistoric Man Whose Head Was Mounted on a Stake

In 2011, Swedish archaeologists found human skulls that had been mounted on stakes at an 8,000-year-old burial site, representing a behavior rarely seen among prehistoric hunter-gatherers. An incredible, computer-aided facial reconstruction finally puts a face to one of these skulls. — … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Reconstruction and physical fit analysis of fragmented skeletal remains using 3D imaging and printing – ScienceDirect

Reconstruction and physical fit analysis of fragmented skeletal remains using 3D imaging and printing – ScienceDirect — Read on http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910720300633

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Forensic Science, human identification, open access forensic information | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: A forensic undergrad tests slime concoction for partial print examiners.

College kids in forensics are keen. This new grad did some simple testing with silly slime and fingerprint chemicals. https://phys.org/news/2020-06-unusual-forensic-technique.html

Posted in AAFS, Forensic Science, human identification | Leave a comment

Forensics: Dangers of Facial Recognition platforms. A study

These programs are not “objective evidence” for police suspicion that you are a crook. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X20300024

Posted in AAFS, Civil rights, CSI, forensic evidence exaggeration, human identification | Leave a comment