Category Archives: Forensic Science Bias

Forensics: Better late than never. Study Assesses the Accuracy and Reproducibility of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis

This research is part of a broader portfolio of impression & pattern evidence projects managed by NIJ Physical Scientist, Gregory Dutton, Ph.D. Find more information about impression & pattern evidence research at NIJ. Find more on bloodstain pattern analysis. — … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias | Leave a comment

Forensics: Mostly Partial Prints and DUI Testing. The Slow but Steady March Towards a More Reliable Forensic Science

When Henry Swofford stepped to the microphone at a gathering of forensic scientists in 2016, he surprised the audience when he announced that he had directed his investigators to no longer use the terms “identification” or “individualization” to link an … Continue reading

Posted in AAFS, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, junk forensic science | Leave a comment

Forensics: The influence of ‘infallible’ ballistic matching. Letting the jury decide. Maryland high court considers limiting ballistics evidence used to link guns to shootings

BALTIMORE — A television in Baltimore Circuit Court showed a magnified picture of spent cartridge casings taken through the lens of a microscope. If a juror didn’t look closely, they — Read on http://www.union-bulletin.com/content/tncms/live/

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: The history of DAs supporting junk science. A look back in time.

csidds.com/2016/12/09/are-we-in-the-twilight-zone-bitemarks-can-now-prove-innocence/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform protecting the innocent, junk forensic science, US Crime labs | Leave a comment

Forensics: Bitemarks take another hit in 2022. Why Is Bad Science Allowed in the Courtroom? | Psychology Today

A new report finds that a well-known forensic technique is unscientific. — Read on http://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/how-do-you-know/202210/why-is-bad-science-allowed-in-the-courtroom

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Brown shooting evidence, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, Exoneration costs, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science | 1 Comment

Forensics: Every Year, Around $800M Spent on Wrongful Convictions

Adnan Syed’s case caught the nation’s attention thanks to its feature in the popular podcast “Serial,” and led to the once-convicted murderer having his conviction overturned, — Read on http://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2022/10/28/every_year_around_800m_spent_on_wrongful_convictions_860485.html

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Perjury by Prosecutors | Leave a comment

Forensics: Inaccurate expert assumptions touted as facts and supressed exculpatory witnesses. Rodney Reed Takes DNA Testing Fight to Supreme Court

Now Reed is taking his fight to the Supreme Court. — Read on theintercept.com/2022/10/09/rodney-reed-supreme-court-dna-testing/

Posted in AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic pathology, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, wrongful convictions | 1 Comment

Forensics: Bitemarker co-founder Souviron recants 1985 testimony that convicted him. But judge doesn’t care the science didn’t hold up. 37 years later he’s still in an Alabama prison.

Teeth marks convicted him, but the science didn’t hold up. 37 years later he’s still in an Alabama prison. – al.com — Read on http://www.al.com/news/2022/10/teeth-marks-convicted-him-but-the-science-didnt-hold-up-37-years-later-hes-still-in-an-alabama-prison.html

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Forensic Dentistry, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, Ray Krone bitemark case, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Debunking “Excited delerium.” Prone restraint cardiac arrest in in‐custody and arrest‐related deaths – Weedn – 2022 – Journal of Forensic Sciences –

Prone restraint cardiac arrest in in‐custody and arrest‐related deaths – Weedn – 2022 – Journal of Forensic Sciences – Wiley Online Library — Read on onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1556-4029.15101

Posted in AAFS, Forensic Science Bias | Tagged | Leave a comment

Forensics: Go Valena Beety! ‘Cultural Bias’ and Wrongful Convictions of Women

Women are more likely than men to be convicted for crimes they didn’t commit—or for crimes that never occurred—and they often face harsher sentences, a webinar was told. — Read on thecrimereport.org/2022/07/22/cultural-bias-and-wrongful-convictions-of-women/

Posted in AAFS, costs of wrongful convictions, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, wrongful convictions | Tagged | Leave a comment