Monthly Archives: August 2024

Junk forensics kills. Killer mistakes: Why are exonerations so difficult on death row?

Posted on August 19, 2024 by csidds

The fact that there are so many roadblocks erected to prevent success in freeing falsely convicted inmates from death row, and that it takes so long to bring about an exoneration, is truly scandalous. — Read on thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4831550-death-row-exoneration/

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Crime, death penalty, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, iCloud criminal investigations, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Typical whitewash of junk bitemarker myth. In PubMed! They now buddy up with DNA. Integration of Bite Mark Microbiome Analysis with Forensic DNA Profiling: Advancements, Challenges, and Synergistic Approaches – PubMed

Posted on August 4, 2024 by csidds

Bite mark analysis plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations, by helping to identify suspects and establish links between individuals and crime scenes. However, traditional bite mark methodologies face significant challenges due to issues with reliability and subjectivity. Recent advances … Continue reading →

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice, forensic fraud, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment

Forensics: Yet the #AAFS still endorses the org that personally attacked Dr. Mary Bush. Tools of dental professor’s bitemark research included in Smithsonian exhibition

Posted on August 3, 2024 by csidds

Tools of dental professor’s bitemark research included in Smithsonian exhibition – University at Buffalo — Read on http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/06/Mary-Bush-bitemark-research-Smithsonian.html

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, exoneration, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, forensic science misconduct, forensic science reform, human identification, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions | Leave a comment