Forensics: Round 2 soon coming your way. Council Concludes Bite-Mark Analysis Is Junk – The Intercept

This is from 2016. Then Trump eviscerated forensic science reform. Prosecutors, some crime lab ppl, and the FBI (Lynch and Sessions) all personally attacked the Obama admin’s (including Eric Lander and the “activist and conflicted” Innocence Project) multiple science commissions critiques of police over-stated crime lab traditions.

Lander is now back in as head of Biden’s Science and Tech Policy which generated so much anguish for these governmental “protectors of forensic integrity.” In particular, the bitemarkers squealed loudly in their seminally stupid “enamel and epidermis” tirade that Zalman and Windell recently skewered in “The Bite Mark Dentists Counterattack on Forensic Science Reform.”

A draft report from a presidential council of science and technology advisers determined that forensic bite-mark analysis has no scientific validity.
— Read on theintercept.com/2016/09/07/white-house-report-concludes-that-bite-mark-analysis-is-junk-science/

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, Forensic Dentistry, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic fraud, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s