Tag Archives: common source forensic opinions.

Forensics: The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism – ScienceDirect

Posted on March 3, 2022 by csidds

The bitemarkers get thoroughly dumped on in the paper as “non-scientists.” The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism – ScienceDirect — Read on http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X22000079

Posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, Identification DVI | Tagged , | Leave a comment