Forensics: The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism – ScienceDirect

The bitemarkers get thoroughly dumped on in the paper as “non-scientists.”

The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism – ScienceDirect
— Read on www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X22000079

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, costs of wrongful convictions, expert testimony, forensic evidence exaggeration, forensic science misconduct, Identification DVI and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment