Forensics: “Bitemarks no longer accepted.” Appeals court says man can challenge bite mark evidence in 1978 Wood River murder

Posted on April 16, 2021 by csidds

John N. Prante had challenged the bite mark evidence that contributed to a murder conviction and a 75-year prison sentence.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/appeals-court-says-man-can-challenge-bite-mark-evidence-in-1978-wood-river-murder/article_134eb7bc-f4a8-5d05-ade8-f14ead38db2b.html

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Forensics: “Bitemarks no longer accepted.” Appeals court says man can challenge bite mark evidence in 1978 Wood River murder

  1. Curt's avatar Curt says:
    April 16, 2021 at 8:45 am

    Michael,
    The link here is not valid:
    http://www.stltoday.com/content/tncms/live/
    Best,
    Curt

    Reply

Leave a reply to csidds Cancel reply