John N. Prante had challenged the bite mark evidence that contributed to a murder conviction and a 75-year prison sentence.
Forensics: “Bitemarks no longer accepted.” Appeals court says man can challenge bite mark evidence in 1978 Wood River murder
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Michael,
The link here is not valid:
http://www.stltoday.com/content/tncms/live/
Best,
Curt
Thanks Curt. Is it still snowing 🌨 in ME?
Link in post doesn’t work? This will:
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/appeals-court-says-man-can-challenge-bite-mark-evidence-in-1978-wood-river-murder/article_134eb7bc-f4a8-5d05-ade8-f14ead38db2b.html
As usual…… late to the party!