Forensics: The result of bs bitemark opinions. Man execution 15 years on death row for killing daughter is scheduled.

I know this case. There were 3 suspects. All had adult teeth which were incredibly similar. A Texas ABFO dentist claimed he could differentiate the defendant Bourgeois from the other 2. The skin patterns were distorted and wildly Photoshopped. The federal judge clearly favored bitemarks as equivalent to fingerprints. The Texas state Forensic Science Commission has now rejected the use of this junk quackery. Unfortunately, this case is in federal court.

Alfred Bourgeois’ execution is set for December 11. This comes after murdering his two year old daughter
— Read on www.kiiitv.com/article/news/alfred-bourgeois-man-faces-execution-after-15-years-on-death-row-for-killing-daughter-in-2002/503-dc4082fc-eeb8-47a9-a68e-39ba60dfe187

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, death penalty, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, junk forensic science and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s