…………..the sometimes nefarious and commonly exaggerated forensic opinions prosecutors continue use to convict has little effect on the lofty judges who never took a science class after 12th grade. Their denials of legitimate claims of unfair criminal convictions is the theme of a man’s upcoming execution date in Texas.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2019/08/17/did-faulty-science-bad-testimony-bring-larry-swearingen-brink-execution/?noredirect=on

Here is another example of how CA prosecutors pursue a retrial against Kim Long based on nothing but forensic flim-flam.

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/category/flawed-justice-podcast/