There is no better judicial micro-climate than Mississippi to study the self-contradictory and illegitimate misuse of unvalidated forensic opinions in the US. This story describes dubious forensic sciences experts and their untestable methods continuing to be used in courts. No surprise that bitemark ‘matching” (still supported by the ‘elite’ AAFS) is mentioned as a dangerous forensic method.
Read this from ‘The Watch’ by WP journalist/blogger Radley Balko.
Hello friends, how is all, and what you wish for to say on the
topic of this post, in my view its really remarkable for
me.
Reblogged this on FORENSICS in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends and commented:
Don’t read this if you think “CSI” is real.