Category Archives: 702 expert rules for admissibility

Forensics: Human and ethical factors seen in police crime lab toxicology failures

Posted on August 23, 2025 by csidds

I’d like to recommend you this book: “Errors in toxicology testing and the need for full discovery” by Aaron Olson. Sent via PocketBook Reader

Posted in 702 expert rules for admissibility, AAFS, Bad Forensic Science, costs of wrongful convictions, criminal justice reform, forensic fraud | Leave a comment

Forensics: Legal hypocrisy exists. Innocence is not Enough to Avoid Execution

Posted on September 9, 2022 by csidds

On December 8, 2021, Brunn W. Roysden, III asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the State of Arizona to execute an innocent man. — Read on http://www.laprogressive.com/

Posted in 702 expert rules for admissibility, AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Forensics: What is an expert and what to do about it.

Posted on March 13, 2022 by csidds

A good read about how Daubert expert evidence rules have been misapplied by 100 of judges. New Rule 702 might help. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bloomberg-law-analysis/analysis-say-goodbye-to-daubert-motion-hello-to-new-rule-702/?utm_source=Email_Share

Posted in 702 expert rules for admissibility, AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic testimony | 1 Comment