Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

A panel of experts could determine if “pattern of misconduct” occurred.
— Read on www.vpm.org/news/2024-10-24/mary-jane-burton-admissible-scott-surovell-virginia-dna-testing

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, Civil rights, costs of wrongful convictions, Crime lab scandal, criminal justice reform, death penalty, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Forensics: Incompetent hair analysis led to 8 executions and hundreds of convictions. Virginia Crime Commission recommends deeper review of Mary Jane Burton’s work | VPM

  1. I “learned” microscopic hair comparison in 1974. I thought it was BS then, but got away from it by saying I felt it was “too subjective” and that my skills as a microscopist caused me to be “less confident” in my ability to declare a match.

    That resulted in a transfer from the microscopy lab to the arson lab, and the rest is history.

Leave a reply to John Lentinni Cancel reply