A wide open look at the face of junk forensics from 2015. The bitemarkers now claim they are “new and improved.” They certainly will argue that myth at upcoming evidentiary hearings in 2 southern states of the US. It is outrageous that US prosecutors still stoop, in 2021, to such abysmal use of these scientific misanthropes.

Forensic dentists who peddled junk science now admit they were wrong. But will their colleagues — and the courts — listen?
— Read on theintercept.com/2015/08/20/flawed-science-of-bite-marks/