Forensics: let’s hear it for another biased and messed up Jack the Ripper case

Posted on September 29, 2019 by csidds

This time its the Journal of Forensic Sciences that gets the gong for publishing a one-sided example of fumbled assumptions and disconnected exaggerations abt mitochondrial DNA.
https://www.kxan.com/news/jack-the-ripper-identity-questioned-by-texas-state-research-professor/

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Bad Forensic Science, criminal justice, DNA profiling, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Forensics: let’s hear it for another biased and messed up Jack the Ripper case

  1. SCP's avatar SCP says:
    September 29, 2019 at 6:25 pm

    The forensic scientists in Texas are doing much the same, except they’re using mtDNA and whole genome sequencing (along with taxpayer money) to prove the existence of Sasquatch.

    https://anonfile.com/nbneq975n1/2012_Novel_North_American_Hominins_Next_Generation_Sequencing_of_Three_Whole_Genomes_and_Associated_Studies_pdf

    Those forensic scientist in Texas are so progressive.

    Reply

Leave a reply to SCP Cancel reply