A legal eagle (judge) says judges are a “quick study” about science. Thats still not science. Their messed up case decisions serve as proof. Some prosecutors take advantage. (Inside Science) — According to Senior U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, at the Southern District of New York, “Forensic science continues to be routinely admitted by the courts, both state and federal, even though considerable doubts have now been raised as to whether forensic science really is science at all, and whether it is reliable and valid.”
— Read on www.insidescience.org/video/judging-value-forensic-evidence
Judging The Value of Forensic Evidence | Inside Science
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bitemarks, criminal justice, junk forensic science and tagged American Academy of Forensic Science, Bad forensic science, wrongful convictions. Bookmark the permalink.