A partial look at fingerprint error distribution : False Exclusions only studied

Image result for brian mayfield fingerprint

I do think ‘false positives’ have been eradicated from police crime lab vernacular.

This FSI article went after “false negatives’ as they say their literature is all about ‘individuation.’ Seems a bit non-sequitor to me as their study is in that very venue. Must be fingerprint person slang for “identifying one person in the entire world’  which the fingerprinters do for a living.

At any rate, this is some research about fingerprint examiners and fingerprint features that ‘might’ contribute to eliminating the actual perp. (abstract only).

I wonder how well distributed this journal is within law enforcement labs.


About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Forensic Science, forensic science reform protecting the innocent and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A partial look at fingerprint error distribution : False Exclusions only studied

  1. It was really a very difficult case and discussed not only in a particular journal but you have it on internet. There are some other cases also where the experts gave disputed opinion to grab the credit for solving the case and for linking the chance print with the criminal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s