DNA is to blame when certain forensic science orgs get caught with their underwear showing. Again

I am struck with the recent declarations by the NCFS regarding their non-mandatory “solutions” to forensic experts being scientifically “shady” in their testimony. Some folks may ask, “What is the backstory on this?   Why is this group (now composed of the best of the AAFS and crime lab communities) now  targeting such transgressions and professional fraud ?”

Truth being said, this has been going on forever. Sir Alec Jeffries is to blame for causing all this dustup.

This blog has been dedicated to shining some light on the above questions.

The NCFS has  finally “called out” certain forensic ner’ do wells (after 5 years of the AAFS  yakking about  nothing substantive regarding these problems)  since  judges are not savvy enough  to protect their system from such prejudicial evidence use against criminal defendants.

There is no rational reason to ignore the presence of convictions sentencing the innocent within the US Criminal Justice system. The data continues to grow. Irrational thought does erupt amongst certain forensic “stakeholders” (such as criticizing or spoofing the NAS 2009 report on “Strengthening the  Forensic Sciences”)  and is generally composed of two variations.

1) It’s the price of doing business. This similar to  “friendly fire.” Totally abhorrent in my opinion.

2)  “Blame it on the lawyers.” A phrase used in desperation by many forensic                            types who have found themselves on the wrong side of lengthy post conviction appellate battles where DNA eventually expunged their “scientific” prowess.

On the legal side, a  tactic oft used by “tough on crime at all costs” prosecutors, when jammed up in wrongful conviction litigation, is: “the defendant is still a ” bad person.” This is an end around manuever where eye-witness accounts and other noxious types of witness evidence used at trial is later proven false during appellate review. This new evidence could be DNA, compelling exculpatory evidence or “egregious/pervasive/systemic/more than one instance” prosecutorial misconduct.

Personally having been involved in 8 successful exoneration cases opposing the “best” of the AAFS odontologists,  I have experienced opposing witnesses exhibiting serious symptoms of what the NCFS is talking about. Yet the AAFS seems oblivious to their negligent past and is self absorbed with looking good in the current press.

I can attest to becoming VERY unpopular with the AAFS/ABFO dentists because of these cases. Harassment  is ongoing but the exonorees seem pleased. Plus I got to write a book about it.

Sorry to bore anyone, but here are more two cases of recent exoneration of defendants sentenced to death. 

 

 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in criminal justice, forensic science reform, forensic testimony and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s