Forensis: Excellent Review. THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN Etc.

Posted on August 5, 2023 by csidds

Conclusions reveal why bm opinions are invalid. Skin distortion and cognitive biases are paramount. Great literature review.

View of THE CHALLENGES TO THE FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN BITE MARKS IN SKIN AND COMPARISON WITH TEETH
— Read on esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4142/99193547137

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, criminal justice reform, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science misconduct, junk forensic science, open access forensic information, wrongful convictions. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment