Forensics: Why Defense Forensics Experts Matter | Psychology Today

I have opposed many a prosecution bitemarker expert claiming equivalency to “its just like a fingerprint.” DAs were never happy. 12 exoneration cases Ive assisted proves who was right.

‘CSI is often presented in a one-sided way at criminal trials. A recent study explores what happens when the defense is given an expert to allow for a real battle of the experts.’
— Read on www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/law-and-psychology/202104/why-defense-forensics-experts-matter

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, ABFO, Bad Forensic Science, Bite Marks, Bitemarks, forensic evidence exaggeration, Forensic Science Bias, forensic science reform, junk forensic science, wrongful convictions. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment