Holtzclaw case points to the misuse and mis information of DNA evidence

 

Image result for touch dna

Add this case to the list of fundamental problems associated with crime lab related determinations of DNA profiling that, as in this case, are misinterpreted in favor of guilt. The alternatives were never brought forth by defense counsel.

A significant leader in the development of DNA’s use in the US criminal justice system describes details of these issues.

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/bomshell-report-holtzclaw-conviction-should-be-overturned

Links to other case and discussion about “touch DNA” dangers in police evidence collection and interpretation.

https://www.creators.com/read/michelle-malkin/01/17/forensic-nightmare-the-perils-of-touch-dna

https://www.forensicmag.com/article/2015/10/touch-dna-might-be-contaminating-crime-scene-evidence

DNA collection from firearms.

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s