US Supremes argue from on high that DA suppressed evidence is AOK

Image result for soothsayer

The “finality of guilt” just got reaffirmed by a bunch of judicial soothsayers ( rather impact sayers ) taking one more corner off the 6th and 14th amendments right to a fair trial.

“This is the latest SCOTUS decision to focus on impact of suppressed evidence, instead of its mere existence, making it harder to get a new trial to challenge a conviction.”

Its a actually another form of judicial predictive analysis concluding about jury perceptions decades after a conviction and is an added escape hatch for prosecutorial misdeeds.

https://news.vice.com/story/supreme-court-ruling-makes-it-harder-to-undo-wrongful-convictions?utm_content=buffer59164&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s