Suppression of evidence is prosecutor misconduct but not material to the conviction?

The US Supreme Court (the pic is the DC Court of Appeals) is looking at this conviction case. It largely is about testifying eyewitness credibility failures and other available witnesses being known by the prosecution but were hidden from the defense. Lower courts didn’t  reverse the conviction based on a low concern that the the noncredible and the hiding affected the trials outcome (8 were convicted, 2 guilty pleas. At the core of this is the effect and interpretation of “What is a Brady violation?”

Article from Honolulu Star Reporter  (the article scrolls to the right).

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s