Explanations on how the intersection of legal “yes or no” determinations of guilt and its interpretation of forensic “science” certainties is a train wreck.

From the Boston Review; “Forensic Psuedoscience.”

A quote from the BR

“Law is a poor vehicle for the interpretation of scientific results.”

http://bostonreview.net/books-ideas/nathan-robinson-forensic-pseudoscience-criminal-justice