“Accelerating forensic science” versus judicial inertia due to “stare decisis”

Image result for slow progress is better than no progress

See the framework for “new” forensic paradigms entering the judicial environment in  every convoluted detail.

Here is an issue-laded Jurimetrics open access paper (18  pages) dealing with the interface of judges’ ‘science’ decision making and changes within forensic science. Simon Cole at UC Irvine uses a familiar case for some of us: William Richards’ bitemark conviction and later exoneration.

Cole in Jurimetrics – Courts Accomodating Scientific Change SSRN-id3046876

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in forensic science reform protecting the innocent and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s