Lamenting leaving courtroom science admissibility to cops and lawyers

“Bite marks is the obvious example. It’s inconceivable to most of us as to how this stuff even continues to be admitted.” – member on the National Commission on Forensic Science. 

Here’s  from the US District Attorneys Association (@NDAAJustice ) president Michael Ramos praising bitemarks. US District Attorneys

Unbelieveable.

 

 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Lamenting leaving courtroom science admissibility to cops and lawyers

  1. SCP says:

    “…There is no evidence the scientific basis for forensic feature comparisons are responsible for wrongful convictions….”

    Well, you can’t fix stupid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s