“Bite marks is the obvious example. It’s inconceivable to most of us as to how this stuff even continues to be admitted.” – member on the National Commission on Forensic Science.
Here’s from the US District Attorneys Association (@NDAAJustice ) president Michael Ramos praising bitemarks. US District Attorneys
Unbelieveable.
“…There is no evidence the scientific basis for forensic feature comparisons are responsible for wrongful convictions….”
Well, you can’t fix stupid.