Lamenting leaving courtroom science admissibility to cops and lawyers

“Bite marks is the obvious example. It’s inconceivable to most of us as to how this stuff even continues to be admitted.” – member on the National Commission on Forensic Science. 

Here’s  from the US District Attorneys Association (@NDAAJustice ) president Michael Ramos praising bitemarks. US District Attorneys

Unbelieveable.

 

 

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Lamenting leaving courtroom science admissibility to cops and lawyers

  1. SCP's avatar SCP says:

    “…There is no evidence the scientific basis for forensic feature comparisons are responsible for wrongful convictions….”

    Well, you can’t fix stupid.

Leave a comment