Rudin on an “Office of Forensic Science”

Rudin Votes “No” on ‘Office of Forensic Sciences.”
Nora Rudin is a DNA pioneer in the US who has some very pointed comments on the issue of forensic science needing to be independent of prosecutorial and police governmental management influences. Despite what many current police science pundits say to the contrary.

Forensics Forum

A comment on a proposal being considered by the CFSO – draft legislation that would create an Office of Forensic Science within the Department of Justice (here is a link to the draft as of Feb. 14, 2017):

Putting an office of forensic science under a law enforcement agency if a fundamentally bad idea.  This would take us backwards, not move us forward.  Additionally, the composition of the board is problematic.  It is slanted toward public agencies and provides no voice to independent scientists.  Again, this takes us backwards not forward.  The problems that the field of forensic science is experiencing is largely due to the insular approach the field has taken historically.  Perpetuating this attitude will only perpetuate the problems, not solve them.  We need to be be reaching out and encouraging an interdisciplinary approach, not circling the wagons.  NIST, a scientific and neutral agency, is the appropriate place…

View original post 21 more words

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s