• Statutory triggers to require audits of tainted crime lab evidence
• Vigorous affirmative efforts to notify clients of the unreliable forensic evidence
• Meaningful access to discovery including transcripts, lab notes, etc.
• Allowing DNA testing when samples are available in a case
• Hearings in which the burden is shifted to the government to prove that the case was not affected by tainted forensic evidence
• Waiving procedural barriers to appeals

Considering many DAs don’t know a thing about forensic science flim-flam and its experts, Law prof Brandon  Garrett gives us these rules that could “re-set” the system’s inadequate protections for the innocent.

https://forensicsforum.net/2016/12/01/professor-garrett-suggests-potential-ground-rules-to-address-convictions-that-result-from-unreliable-forensic-evidence/