Fingerprints tell the tale – Bitemarks are a forensic joke

Image result for fingerprint artifacts

These prints have no relationship to the above case.

Image result for bad fingerprints

A bitemark that still has J Kunco  in prison for a over a quarter of a century. Two pictures of one bitemark. Taken at different times.

Kunco -1990-91 copy

The bitemark experts recently restated their opinions from the original trial. In 1990 they said this evidence lead to a “positive” identification of Kunco as the biter. This year they reaffirmed the value of the skin injury as being valuable pattern evidence for including or excluding someone with adult teeth. Kunco now “cannot be eliminated” according to the bitemark experts. Do they know more than we do? I doubt it. Give it a try.

Just how much information can YOU see? Don’t be confused.

Here is a hint: The BW (1991) pic (‘improved’ by UV light) needs to be rotated 90 degrees CW to be compared  to the color photo. They didn’t do that.

Here are Kunco’s teeth from the time of trial. Remember upper front teeth are twice the size of lower front teeth. Hint: Their courtroom exhibit has the upper front teeth at the bottom of the image.

 

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s