Details into what the Texas Forensic Science Commission is all about. Too bad there are 48 other states without similar legislative produced review boards. The White House needs to become more active in supporting and implementing similar standards. So far the National Forensic Science Commission has produced a languid collection of vocabulary and future “tasks.”
Readers should know that there will be certain prosecutors who will not quietly agree to following the Texas decision to promote a mandate on banning bitemark believers from their cases-in-chief.
The review starts with:
“Texas prosecutors and judges should (italics added) maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system by voluntarily declaring a moratorium on the use of bite-mark evidence in criminal cases as recommended by the Texas Forensic Commission.”
FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends 