Appeal court actually uses Daubert to overrule use of non-science assumptions

Its all about scientific support, or lack there of in the appellate halls of North Carolina.

DWI ‘extapolations’ of BA to assume alcohol ‘eliminating’ phase at time of testing take a hit.

Thanks to GGWolk

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Appeal court actually uses Daubert to overrule use of non-science assumptions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s