Appeal court actually uses Daubert to overrule use of non-science assumptions

Posted on March 9, 2017 by csidds

Its all about scientific support, or lack there of in the appellate halls of North Carolina.

DWI ‘extapolations’ of BA to assume alcohol ‘eliminating’ phase at time of testing take a hit.

Thanks to GGWolk

Unknown's avatar

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Appeal court actually uses Daubert to overrule use of non-science assumptions

Leave a comment