I contend…

This writer is a dear colleague of mine and definitely NOT a member of the ‘heralded’ American Board of Forensic Odontology. She is a full time death investigator working cases on a daily basis. As opposed to the standard  “occasional” forensic odontologist.

Eye of the beholder

The use of information is power.  When asked (by Robert Toale, a lawyer who represented Abadie and Van Winkle), about his ‘margin of error’ in bitemark analysis, Michael West said, “Something less than my savior, Jesus Christ”.

There is no sense whatsoever in challenging the so-called ‘margin of error’ a specific scientist claims, in this case a Forensic Odontologist, about his or her confidence level in the professional opinion they render in bitemark analysis.  The true test is what the jury will believe.  And, I might venture, since there was a ‘CSI’ episode involving a bitemark, the jury will chomp on the bait.

The legal profession, in my opinion, must claim responsibility for the admissibility of this ‘bitemark evidence’, the testimony of the biased Foresnsic Dentist who delivered it, and the verdict.  Mike West was afforded the power to sway the jury, by the prosecution.  I think it is a heavy burden for gate keepers to determine whether…

View original post 101 more words

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s