Absolutely the best example of contemporary forensic misconduct by an AAFS recognized group advocating their particular brand of “science.” See how their culture of rejecting their own reliability research passes from one generation to the next. This last happened in 1999.
Yesterday’s article from the Washington Post.
FORENSICS and LAW in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends 
Reblogged this on FORENSICS in FOCUS @ CSIDDS | News and Trends and commented:
Just a note. The harassment of forensic dentists and researchers opposing the continued use of bitemarks i skin rather than DNA analysis continues. Its the same bunch as always within the bitemark advocates who have vested financial interests. The general membership of the ABFO remains curiously silent.