Chauvin trial aftermath: In defense of Dr. David Fowler. (Weak). 531 think otherwise. The case of the incredible expert

As usual, forensic pathology opinion controversy results in much semantics and little scientific data. The semantics do talk about “science” and “standards” but very little else is available for factual guidance.

Widely criticized for his testimony in the Derek Chauvin case, his tenure under review by the Maryland Attorney General, this can’t be the retirement Maryland’s former medical examiner expected.
— Read on www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-md-rodricks-0502por-fowler-testimony-20210430-k3l6pdzgoraj5bb5bwarobaazu-story.html

About csidds

Dr. Michael Bowers is a long time forensic consultant in the US and international court systems.
This entry was posted in AAFS, criminal justice, criminal justice reform, expert testimony, Forensic Science, Forensic Science Bias and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s